Bibliographic Management

Trace has the answer and tells us. Wikipedia is not a reliable source.

Wikipedia Reliable Sources Perennial Sources Wikipedia

Here are some points to consider.

Is wikipedia a credible source. Scholarly inquiry requires analyzing information for credibility and understanding if an online resource is primary secondary or irrelevant Pasquini writes. Its the go-to website for information on just about anything. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism a work in progress or just plain wrong.

Generating keywords and search terms. These two studies show that although academia generally rejects Wikipedia as a source which makes sense for an extremely rigorous review process it does not reject it as useful platform. However you probably wont find any pages that are bogus and full of errors unless you specifically set out to find them.

It contains millions of articles and depends mainly on volunteers and contributors to ensure that information are up to date. So is Wikipedia a credible source. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community from freshman students to distinguished professorship as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick ready reference to get a sense of a concept or idea.

Sadly the answer is that it depends on what you are using it for. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable published sources making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered see WikipediaNeutral point of view. What they fail to realize is that Wikipedia is one of the most reliable sources of information.

Before any source can be considered credible it must first have a reputation for accuracy. No because even though Wikipedia is one of the Webs most popular reference sites it isnt a credible resource because anyone is allowed to be a contributor to. The creators of Wikipedia are the first to admit that not every entry is accurate and that it might not be the best source of material for research papers.

Wikipedia as a credible source for your research paper. Wikipedia Academic has posted an article explaining why. It has such a broad subject.

One reason why Wikipedia Wiki for short is trustworthy is because of its extensive use of citations on each page. Moran Wikipedia provides Internet users with millions of articles on a broad range of topics and commonly ranks first in search engines. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time.

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. But is the info on Wikipedia worth its weight in megabytes. More likely you will find and have already found without realizing it pages that are mostly correct but have one or two key errors that will certainly lead you astray if you put your blind faith in them.

Nevertheless most teachers still feel that Wikipedia is not a credible source to use for research on school related projects. However those who challenge Wikipedia as a credible source argue that Wikipedias currency does not guarantee its reliability. But its reliability and credibility fall well short of the standards for a school paper.

No Wikipedia is not a credible source. Armed with these skills students like scientists can mine Wikipedia for accurate and credible information without falling for fake news. Another major problem is.

So information may not always be accurate. Look for a slant. T The project is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation a non-profit.

Now the ultimate question of this discussion is whether or not Wikipedia is a credible source. An encyclopedia is generally not a good source. On the whole the web encyclopedia is fairly reliable but Lifes Little Mysteries own small investigation produced mixed results.

Wikipedia is the largest and most popular general reference work on the Internet and is ranked the fifth-most popular website. If no reliable sources can be found on a topic Wikipedia should not have an article on it. Numerous studies have rated Wikipedias accuracy.

Some articles are fair and balanced but others look more like the Leaning Tower of Pisa. This is an open source that anyone can add and edit articles. The hardest part in research can sometimes be finding the right keywords to use.

Wikipedia even has a disclaimer which warns that its articles may not be completely accurate. It is the quickest and easier way to gain general knowledge on a specific topic. Wikipedia- is it a credible and valid source of information.

October 27 2011 0800 AM by Mark E. Wikipedia can be great for your first research on a topic. Many of the entries are well-documented checked for quality and as opposed to reference books often completely up-to-date but 20 years after its creation.

Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Because anyone can edit Wikipedia articles they are subject to false information.